The fact that the younger generation is more accepting gives me hope for a better future for everyone. History of the Same-Sex Marriage Debate, - present. Massachusetts, which became the first US state to legalize gay marriage inhad the lowest divorce rate in the country in Said by me -a former foster kid with a single mother.
Another argument is rooted in semantics: marriage is the union of a man and a woman, and so cannot be extended to same-sex couples. Commonsense and millennia of human history make it very clear that children deserve their parents. Historians find, same sex marriage debate pros and cons philippines map in Norman instance, that it destabilizes a society when some men take many wives and leave large numbers of other men without the opportunity to mate.
Here are the proper bibliographic citations for this page according to four style manuals in alphabetical order :. Proper citation depends on your preferred or required style manual. Con 10 Marriage is an outmoded, oppressive institution that should be weakened, not expanded.
Promo code: SAVE Sign up for an account. They also have more or less equal chances of succeeding if legally recognized and accepted.
It probably would not be a bad idea to set the minimum age for a marriage license at thirty where more people are financially stable and mature enough to undertake the responsibilities that marriage demands. Surely we must live together with some degree of mutual acceptance, even if doing so involves compromise.
Exception should not be made the norm. Polygyny is just one of the multiple forms of plural marriage, and not all polygynous relationships are dysfunctional or involve crimes. That is easier said than done when all of us want at least some space to shape our intimate relationships to fit our idiosyncratic ends.
Emens, Just Monogamy? If anything, philosophically, the fervor with which same-sex couples demand to be granted the dignity and respect of legal marriage underscores the value of marriage and ought to remind us straight couples not to take it lightly or for granted. With the exception of perfectionists, many liberals adhere to one version of such neutrality or another by being committed to the principle that the state should not dictate to people what kind of life they ought to have.
So let me break this down for you. Psychologically, it is probably asking a lot of anyone to hate the sin and love the sinner—to separate behavior they are convinced in morally reprehensible from the person who behaves in that way. Only the union of a man and a woman may involve the unique physical act from which children are created, and children best flourish when raised by their biological mother and father who are united in marriage.