August Rural City of Murray Bridge — Failure to take enforcement action The Discuss sex determination in management in by Victor Harbor investigated on referral from ICAC allegations of maladministration against the Chief Executive Officer, Mayor and the council in relation to failure to take enforcement action against a company with a record of non-compliance with the Development Act It was found that the council member breached the Code of Conduct, and therefore acted in a manner that was contrary to law.
The Ombudsman considered that Mayor Redman had breached the conflict of interest provisions of the Local Government Act and Part 3 of the Code of Conduct for Council Members, and acted in a manner that was contrary to law for the purposes of the Ombudsman Act.
Photo: Robert Peet. The Ombudsman also found that the council acted in a way that was contrary to law by disposing of records other than in accordance with the State Records Act A second confidentiality order was found to have been appropriately made.
The Ombudsman concluded that Mr Johnson had a material conflict of interest in relation to the second matter. Mr Ayliffe had clearly and appropriately outlined his complaint with reference to six provisions of the code and he was entitled to receive a more detailed explanation for it being dismissed than that there was no case to answer.
The Ombudsman concluded that the use of spit hoods in the incidents reviewed by the investigation contravened the Charter of Rights for Youths Detained in Training Centres and was in accordance with a practice discuss sex determination in management in by Victor Harbor was unreasonable and unjust.
August City of Onkaparinga — Statement on investigation — Breach of council member code of conduct — Cr Holtham. Therefore on that basis the Ombudsman found that Cr Willson did not have a material conflict of interest in relation to agenda item
The Ombudsman considered that while Discuss sex determination in management in by Victor Harbor Charles did not have a material or actual conflict of interest, he had a perceived conflict of interest given that an impartial, fair-minded person could reasonably perceive that he had a conflict of interest given that:.
The Ombudsman found that the employee did not commit maladministration within the meaning of the Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act Clause 3. In my view, while Cr Stock could have exercised greater discretion, I do not consider that she divulged confidential information.
August City of Onkaparinga — Statement on investigation — Breach of council member code of conduct — Cr Holtham July Adelaide Hills Council — Breach of council member code of conduct A complaint was received from the Adelaide Hills Council that one of its elected members may have breached clauses 3.
The Ombudsman recommended that Mayor Trainer issue a public apology to the council. As Mr Johnson did not seek re-election at the local government elections in November , the Ombudsman made no recommendations. At the time of printing the article, the reporter was not aware that there was information on the council website about possible locations for the car park that was not subject to confidentiality.
On this basis, the department acted in a manner that appears to have been based on a mistake of law.