While states with comprehensive sex education have lower teen pregnancy rates, even in these states rates are much higher than seen in Europe . Data on four possibly confounding factors were included in our analyses. Must we fear adolescent sexuality?
Department of Health and Human Services announced that the Teen Pregnancy Prevention TPP Program—a grant program created by the Obama administration abstinence only education vs comprehensive sex education in Hartford to reduce teen pregnancy rates in the United States—will provide funding only to organizations promoting abstinence-only approaches.
We used the most recent teenage pregnancy, abortion and birth data from all U. CT, WV .
The irony of the situation, however, is that those parents and policymakers who most want young people to remain abstinent still support abstinence-only-until-marriage programs when they should be supporting comprehensive sexuality education, which holds far more promise for delaying the initiation of sexual activity among young people.
In the United States, abstinence only education vs comprehensive sex education in Hartford, births as a result of pregnancies sustained by women from the ages fifteen to nineteen were recorded in CDC, Therefore, the responsibility for creating sex education policy falls to abstinence only education vs comprehensive sex education in Hartford states, many of which pass the responsibility on to the individual school districts, many of which pass the responsibility on to the individual schools.
Two states mandate sex ed only:. Strengths of this research design is that the longitudinal set-up will allow for the researcher to be in contact with the participants for the long-term until they are twenty-one, giving them the chance to collect data of their sexual and reproductive activities throughout their adolescent years in order to form inferences on how students understand and absorb the sex education given to them.
Chevrette, M. Proposal Disclaimer: This work has been submitted by a student. What is Comprehensive Sex Education? Consequences of protective sex education and abstinence-only sex education on teenage pregnancy rates in the United States.
Press enter to search. After accounting for the influence of teen education, the level of abstinence education still had a significant influence on both teen pregnancy and teen birth rates. Many states accept funds for both abstinence-only programs and evidence-based interventions.
However, the state does offer schools guidelines about what it feels should be taught. Hoff said the Kaiser study showed that local and state officials exerted the most influence over sex-education programs.
Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Abstinence: The central message of these programs is to delay sexual activity until marriage, and under the federal funding regulations most of these programs cannot include information about contraception or safer-sex practices  , .